the speed of Light

Ant theory of the universe has to address this problem as it has been shown to be correct time and time again [ incidentally , look up einstein's equation proof, it's not as  difficult as I've often read in the literature] . My theory twists it even further by saying 3x10^8 m/s isnt fixed as the time is variable  [ time flows faster the older the universe] so photons sent from a distant part of the universe when 'measured' [ ie seen by us say] the photon now has our time scale and hence a redshift as it converts...
So this is a serious requirement for this theory. If we say that the local expansion of the universe is a function of the local time flow , then it follows that the speed of light is related to that expansion. The universe cannot ? be expanding locally at the speed of light , however, for [ what I consider] obvious reasons , and thus must be related to a physical bottleneck .
The bottleneck, i'm calling 'the ether' . I know this was shown to be bunkum years ago, but I want to bring this up to date. A wave needs a medium to travel in . The Universe is a miasma of fundamentals being created /destroyed at a phenomenal, yet finite rate, which is what I'm calling the ether.
Thus the speed of light is finite in a nutshell .
At present, our [local] universe is expanding and accelerating , but is also being compressed by the anti matter around the edge of it. At the start of the universe, the compression effect would be zero , and if all else is equal, the speed of light would be greater than at present . This would allow for the initial expansion to be greater than the speed of light [ as measured now] itself at least for several 'universal ticks. A reason for 'Inflation theory ' to work ?. Another route to inflation theory, of course is that we are basing our equations on time flow at the present time . Then the universe ticks were vastly different ....

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Moskva and Neptune Missiles

Image
 Don't know about you but I was wondering about this ship sinking and how it happened ...  The hard info [below] can be found by search .  Anyhow, it's a lorry launched [air] system developed from a Russian design and designed to knock out ships up to 5000 tonnes . Moskva was 15,000, but got hit twice.  The ship was designed to protect other vessels from incoming missiles . It looks like it might have been targeted to allow for future hits maybe ?  The strategy was to hassle the defences with drones , and then launch whilst distracted , and was rather successful ,, hitting a loaded missile tube [ apparently ] thereby multiplying its destructive power . This and other aspects of Ukraine defence certainly look and feel like intelligent warfare, by far better than in 2014 , when Russia first attacked . One tidbit I recall reading was a few weeks  before the start of the war and stated that Ukraine defences were much better now than in 2014, [they said] primari...
Read more

Herd Immunity explained for Dummies

Image
Well I don't know about you , but herd immunity is a bit like, we all know what it is , 'cos we've been told - So it's easy like ????? its about 90% innit ? So far, so good. A standard definition is the amount that would stop an infection getting out of control, in that for every person infected, they, in turn , would infect [ on average] no more than one other person . For this reason epidemiologists often quote the reinfection rate for clarity. Coronavirus is 2.4 , ie for every person getting it, on average 2.4 people get it from that person [ assuming no other situations affect this] . Let's take a reinfection of 1.00 for simplicity,ie for every person catching it, they reinfect another person. So for a family of 4 , one person gets it- 1-2 family members catch it ..... Wrong.... this is about statistics [ long word, so just call it odds if you know a little about betting] . If one family member gets it, it becomes likely that the entire family may well su...
Read more
Briefing By Boris Johnson 20/4/21 This was a strange briefing. Normally Boris comes to deliver good news or put a gloss on bad [ at the start of the 1st lockdown was the only 1 I recall as it happens] .  This time , we had a briefing saying people should get vaccinated , and nothing else ; primarily by his GP sidekick . The nothing else bit was emphasised by Boris forgetting about the mandatory graphs and needed to be reminded at the time . In short, a bit of a mess saying nothing . Remembering that briefings were only going to be public for important things , which this categorically did NOT qualify . Finally the length was much shorter than others .  It is barely possible that HMG was trying to get UK vaccination rate above the 85+% ? it's already achieving and someone managed to persuade Boris to forget his normal reticence of staying in the foreground and delivering what to him would be something below his attention span , but does seem very unlikely. If one looks at the n...
Read more