Posts

Showing posts from May, 2015

the speed of Light

Ant theory of the universe has to address this problem as it has been shown to be correct time and time again [ incidentally , look up einstein's equation proof, it's not as  difficult as I've often read in the literature] . My theory twists it even further by saying 3x10^8 m/s isnt fixed as the time is variable  [ time flows faster the older the universe] so photons sent from a distant part of the universe when 'measured' [ ie seen by us say] the photon now has our time scale and hence a redshift as it converts... So this is a serious requirement for this theory. If we say that the local expansion of the universe is a function of the local time flow , then it follows that the speed of light is related to that expansion. The universe cannot ? be expanding locally at the speed of light , however, for [ what I consider] obvious reasons , and thus must be related to a physical bottleneck . The bottleneck, i'm calling 'the ether' . I know this was shown to...

nature of Time and space ?

If you've just come across this post by accident , I'd like to state that I believe that time is purely a dimension [ see other posts as to why] . It sort of comes out of my hypothesis , and has always sounded strange even to me [ Yeah, I know Einstein also said the same thing but he still went on about time as stuff passing/moving]. However, a thought occurred  to me . If we assume that a species exists which is 2 dimensional . That 2 dimensional 'world' [ to the species of course] let's say is travelling through space at a reasonably steady rate , then 'time'  could be measured as the position of that world in 3 dimensions . It follows that time can be thought of as travelling through the 4th dimension in our universe . Neat analogy ? Quantum mechanics apparently has no time in its equations, which could fit neatly into this concept . ? It also fits wonderfully into my hypothesis which states that time passing is a variable which changes where and when ...
Image
Copralites The UK is unusual in that it [had] about 7 foot of copralite deposits under much of the land . Most was been mined out now during the first world war , appartently the biggest deposit left is under Cambridge. As shit goes , its a wonderful resource , full of phosphates . We can thank the dinosaurs for something at least ! However, The amount of dinosaurs producing that prodigious amount of droppings beggars belief ! The reason it didnt degrade, one assumes is that it was all dropped under water, so all this wildlife was aquatic, something that wasnt expounded upon when i was a kid [ and that's when we get interested in these things ! ] Did this foul sufficient of the water to stop bacteria doing its own business , rather than fossilising the stuff ? I suspect the beaches wouldnt have got a cleas bill of health for bathers in those days .....