scientific-thoughts

If you read my articles before this post , he idea of what I believe. basically the Universe [not just ours]  consists lots [ possibly a googleplex or vastly more !] of other unverses [ of which ours is just one]. These all curl up inside themselves to create to an outside observer [if thats possible to see] a singularity , which on aggregate has zero energy, time and , of course , dimensions. Each universe has within it, lots of others , like the archetype russian doll... Time flow , goes from hugely negative at the outside edges, to it's equivalent at the epicentre [ although there might be a negative section caught in the centre] . If one could look inwards into a universe the equivalent distance then time flow would be slower at that point as it is 'younger. [ or if that universe is the other way round , then  faster . Whether it's possible to into an area of zero dimensions, is a moot point, but hey , ho, technology improves all the time ... However , if one could l...

Ant theory of the universe has to address this problem as it has been shown to be correct time and time again [ incidentally , look up einstein's equation proof, it's not as  difficult as I've often read in the literature] . My theory twists it even further by saying 3x10^8 m/s isnt fixed as the time is variable  [ time flows faster the older the universe] so photons sent from a distant part of the universe when 'measured' [ ie seen by us say] the photon now has our time scale and hence a redshift as it converts... So this is a serious requirement for this theory. If we say that the local expansion of the universe is a function of the local time flow , then it follows that the speed of light is related to that expansion. The universe cannot ? be expanding locally at the speed of light , however, for [ what I consider] obvious reasons , and thus must be related to a physical bottleneck . The bottleneck, i'm calling 'the ether' . I know this was shown to...

If you've just come across this post by accident , I'd like to state that I believe that time is purely a dimension [ see other posts as to why] . It sort of comes out of my hypothesis , and has always sounded strange even to me [ Yeah, I know Einstein also said the same thing but he still went on about time as stuff passing/moving]. However, a thought occurred  to me . If we assume that a species exists which is 2 dimensional . That 2 dimensional 'world' [ to the species of course] let's say is travelling through space at a reasonably steady rate , then 'time'  could be measured as the position of that world in 3 dimensions . It follows that time can be thought of as travelling through the 4th dimension in our universe . Neat analogy ? Quantum mechanics apparently has no time in its equations, which could fit neatly into this concept . ? It also fits wonderfully into my hypothesis which states that time passing is a variable which changes where and when ...

Copralites The UK is unusual in that it [had] about 7 foot of copralite deposits under much of the land . Most was been mined out now during the first world war , appartently the biggest deposit left is under Cambridge. As shit goes , its a wonderful resource , full of phosphates . We can thank the dinosaurs for something at least ! However, The amount of dinosaurs producing that prodigious amount of droppings beggars belief ! The reason it didnt degrade, one assumes is that it was all dropped under water, so all this wildlife was aquatic, something that wasnt expounded upon when i was a kid [ and that's when we get interested in these things ! ] Did this foul sufficient of the water to stop bacteria doing its own business , rather than fossilising the stuff ? I suspect the beaches wouldnt have got a cleas bill of health for bathers in those days .....