Conspiracy coronavirus Theories
I was wondering what serious conspiracy theories there might be . Let's consider the bug in a small amount of detail :
1. It doesnt seem to attack kids
2. It does attack older people / people with medical problems
And what do these mean in terms of coronavirus being a weapon .
SO
1. WEapons target armies . These tend to be young and fit. Neither of the above apply
QED it aint a weapon for warfare .
It could however be a delivery system to help it's host country to aid economic growth [ no care homes for instance]. The virus has been shown to almost certainly originated naturally -but these things could be wrong
SO
There's lots to choose from , but everybody agrees that the problem originated in CHina :
1. There is a biological weapons factory in Wuhan . It could have escaped from there . If so, [ assuming China serves its own purposes] it would have been developing it for its own people. If found out, that would bring about the downfall of its government. Probably not the intention .....
2. America. The US has lots to gain, but the country is younger than most developed nations, so unlikely . It's governance, like most western countries is fairly transparent. See 1 above
3. Russia. Always a good standby . It could send conflicting messages to the US and China , and so foment discord. Its life expectancy of 72 is also young so wouldn't affect it's population to a huge extent. Im not into the Great Game , but theremust be much more Russia could do without risking a [probably terminal] exposure? QED the risk:benefit reward doesnt stack up
4 . The world leaders. Good one for these theories :) . If such a secret society exists, then as private companies, they make good money caring for these people [ if they rule the world, they would surely ahve a decent sized finger in that revenue stream...] . Doesn't make any sense whatsoever .
To my untutored mind , the only culpable culprit is the bat population. Anything that kills humans means less bats being killed in turn. Bats have won zero Nobel prizes , so any deaths most likely are good for bats even if they are in a different country and just because they are mainly too old to go on Bat euthanasia expeditions would goovertheir heads [ samll as they are] .
I rest my case governor .......
1. It doesnt seem to attack kids
2. It does attack older people / people with medical problems
And what do these mean in terms of coronavirus being a weapon .
SO
1. WEapons target armies . These tend to be young and fit. Neither of the above apply
QED it aint a weapon for warfare .
It could however be a delivery system to help it's host country to aid economic growth [ no care homes for instance]. The virus has been shown to almost certainly originated naturally -but these things could be wrong
SO
There's lots to choose from , but everybody agrees that the problem originated in CHina :
1. There is a biological weapons factory in Wuhan . It could have escaped from there . If so, [ assuming China serves its own purposes] it would have been developing it for its own people. If found out, that would bring about the downfall of its government. Probably not the intention .....
2. America. The US has lots to gain, but the country is younger than most developed nations, so unlikely . It's governance, like most western countries is fairly transparent. See 1 above
3. Russia. Always a good standby . It could send conflicting messages to the US and China , and so foment discord. Its life expectancy of 72 is also young so wouldn't affect it's population to a huge extent. Im not into the Great Game , but theremust be much more Russia could do without risking a [probably terminal] exposure? QED the risk:benefit reward doesnt stack up
4 . The world leaders. Good one for these theories :) . If such a secret society exists, then as private companies, they make good money caring for these people [ if they rule the world, they would surely ahve a decent sized finger in that revenue stream...] . Doesn't make any sense whatsoever .
To my untutored mind , the only culpable culprit is the bat population. Anything that kills humans means less bats being killed in turn. Bats have won zero Nobel prizes , so any deaths most likely are good for bats even if they are in a different country and just because they are mainly too old to go on Bat euthanasia expeditions would goovertheir heads [ samll as they are] .
I rest my case governor .......
Comments