scientific reason why more people arent tested [ In UK, but maybe elsewhere]
In the briefing yesterday, it was mentioned that one of the reasons why more tests weren't being done was due to lack of reagents . It was said that reagents made by the test manufacturers were obviously the best and they wanted the best ?
This brought to mind 2 things :
1. in the past, the company I worked for wanted to sell an inorganic , fairly basic chemical [ just very pure] to Japan . We weren't allowed to at the time . One of the reasons was that QA testing could only be done using chemicals manufactured in Japan , because they were superior to the rest of the world , apparently . It was total B/S , but designed to stop competition .... and YES, Japan was superlative in keeping out competitors ....... and
2. Printer manufacturers market their own ink , which is designed for their printers. No-one in their right mind would buy non- 'optimal' ink , would they ???????????
Someone has pulled wool [ dyed?] over somebody's eyes methinks ..........
This brought to mind 2 things :
1. in the past, the company I worked for wanted to sell an inorganic , fairly basic chemical [ just very pure] to Japan . We weren't allowed to at the time . One of the reasons was that QA testing could only be done using chemicals manufactured in Japan , because they were superior to the rest of the world , apparently . It was total B/S , but designed to stop competition .... and YES, Japan was superlative in keeping out competitors ....... and
2. Printer manufacturers market their own ink , which is designed for their printers. No-one in their right mind would buy non- 'optimal' ink , would they ???????????
Someone has pulled wool [ dyed?] over somebody's eyes methinks ..........
Comments