scientific-thoughts

I'll add to this from time to time , especially as new things come to light in the scientific community . 1. Positrons have been seen in space , and no-one knows what theyredoing there , with postualtions about WIMPs colliding and producing them . My theory demands them [ and anti protons etc - Ive not read anything about whether they've been seen as well ] . Thus prediction is that antiprotons exist in space happily as well [ although there could be something that wipes them out ] -- Ive been reading about these over the last few weeks hence its fresh on my mind . 2. Positrons have negative gravity [ how you find if they have negative time is anyone's guess] 3. There's probably more than 1 major Universe . 4. The centre of our universe is full of anti particles in 1 huge lump . 5. The shape of our Universe is roughly spherical , with 2 bits off each end , and must be lumpy [ yes I realise thats already known , but people seem to be surprised that it is , and my theo...

God ! This theory seems to explain how things got started and works . It explains how time started , how the universe came into being , why its growing and what time actually is . God doesnt seem to have any part in it , and has been a bit of a worry,frankly [ anything that advocates atheism isnt going to go down at all well apart from vrey specialised circles ] So, a method of incorprating theism into it ..... All parts of the Universe are interlinked via time. If we postulate that above a certain mass , intelligence comes about [ and at big bang , that mass was BIG{it would havecreated a huge extra lump of stuff} ] . Thus God could be the awareness [call itwhatever you will] of everything . If so , it may want some being that might at some point have to intervene to save it and so we could be gods' creatures . Tweak it to satisfy whichever religion you prefer/believe in , and god has a reason to exist if you want to maintain a belief ......

This is an extension of the last one ... Natural science has a habit of being extremely simple at the most basic level , then becoming extremely complex extremely quickly [ think of the 3 magnets on a board with an iron pendulum experiment?] . Thus if we can simplify things , its possibly correct to do so ..... Mass/energy has mass , energy a place in space-time and gravity . Einstein sorted the mass/energy complexity and showed them to be equivalent . What if gravity is actually equal to space-time ? Its difficult to get one's head around this , but here goes ... If the idea on the previous blog is correct , then time [flux] is merely a dimension in space with the larger the mass , the quicker the time flow . For an observer to view a particle of light which started at time flux t1 , once observed , it is seen as at time flow T0 [ ie the time flux of the observer- so no paradox there] . The speed of light is governed by the rate of creation/destruction of the void [ photons cant ...